Exam (2009)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1258197/
Director: Stuart Hazeldine Script: Simon Garrity, Stuart Hazeldine
Runtime: 101min
Cast: Luke Mably, Colin Salmon, Nathalie Cox, Adar Beck Genre: Mystery / Thriller
Tagline: How far would you go to win the ultimate job?

Interested in an intriguing, mysterious and suspenseful psychological thriller? This one’s about an above ordinary competition for a job at a prestigious and powerful corporation shrouded in mystery. In eighty minutes, eight candidates have to find the correct answer for a seemingly inexistent question and prove their qualification for the job.

A single room provides the setting, where the exam takes place. The whole movie is like a game, a puzzle in need of solving; and there are few clues for the participants; everything is up to their cleverness to speculate. The details shown in the beginning, as the candidates are preparing for the exam, are not random images. The person of authority, called the Invigilator - impersonated by a tall black figure - is very convincing. Right in the beginning after he presents all the constraints and rules of the exam, you kind of get the idea that this is serious business. The words of the Invigilator are repeated in B&W flashbacks, whenever the case, which is a nice touch. But characters are faced with a problem, which is asked a lot during the movie: what is the question? They must decide whether to cooperate or confront each other. Do they work as a team, or is every man for himself? I also found it clever the fact that they did not reveal their names to each other; instead they devised names based on major racial divisions and other visual criteria. So, there is a lot of speculation and as a viewer you speculate together with the characters of the movie, which makes it a sort of brainstorming in trying to figure out what the cuss is actually required of them. Gradually, more and more facts and details are unveiled, but that doesn’t exactly simplify matters as you’d expect. Each candidate has a past, a secret agenda and a set of convictions. As they get to know more about each other, so does the viewer and so do matters get complicated and out of control. Out of the eight applicants, only one will prove fit for the job; all others will be disqualified. How and why? Watch and see.

The touch of science fiction at the end was clever and unlike I had expected they didn’t spoil the movie with some dull ending. Considering how low budget this film was, with unknown actors and all, I think it really managed to stand out. Want to sit on the edge of your seat and use your brain to solve a puzzle? Then this movie is what you are looking for; it maintains curiosity and suspense right up until the end.

Back to business

I've been away for exactly a year. But now I'm back, just as I've promised. There are too many movies to review... but I'm not giving up. I hope my readers will return, just as I have. And remember: feedback keeps me going! So..don't hesitate to express your opinion. Cheers!:)

Perfume: The Story of a Murderer (2006)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0396171/
Director: Tom Tykwer / Script: Andrew Birkin, Bernd Eichinger, Tom Tykwer
Runtime: 147min
Cast: Ben Whishaw, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Hurd-Wood
Genre: Drama / Thriller / Crime
Tagline: Enter an intoxicating world of passion, obsession and murder

The tagline is truly appropriate. It introduces us to the ‘fleeting realm of scent’, to the colourful and ‘intoxicating world of passion, obsession and murder’. Sacrifices have to be made in order to achieve the finest perfume of the world. How far would you go? Can you imagine a perfume so powerful, that it provokes an utter feeling of happiness, love and lust? It doesn’t matter if you can’t; the film will still be a feast for your senses.

The movie is based on Patrick Suskind’s exquisite novel, which has such a rich language as few I have read, being a ‘delicatessen’ for the reader. As superb a language is displayed in the book, as visual imagery in the movie. It is set in 18th century France; the era’s aesthetic being faithfully captured, presenting a colourful world, setting all our senses into motion. We have a narrator, like in fairy tales, who provides the fluidity of the story; the story of Grenouille, some kind of a genius born with an extraordinary sense of smell. The visual is so powerful, that you will almost be able to feel the thousands of smells; the stench and the fragrances alternating on the screen through the images. The extraordinary sense of smell, is an original idea from Suskind, and obviously very useful to a perfumer, which Grenouille is to become. His ‘talent’ of higher sense, is pretty inconceivable to us; but it kept my eyes glued to the screen, as Grenouille took in all the possible smells in the world surrounding him, and found pleasure in it. So much pleasure, that he didn’t need anything else. Interestingly, beautiful and yet untouched girls emanated the finest and most irresistible scent, which Grenouille was mesmerized by and wanted to preserve it, so that he may never had to live without it. His character is weird, but somehow fascinating too; my feelings towards him remained neutral throughout the movie; I found it hard to decide whether he was sympathetic or repulsive (probably because Ben Whishaw wasn’t utterly unattractive). Rachel Hurd-Wood is an excellent choice for an unusually exquisite beauty; it is of no wonder that Grenouille wanted to preserve her scent above anyone else’s; it’s like she was the main ingredient, without which his work would have been incomplete. Did he get to her?

Still asking why should you watch it? Because it is intriguing, mysterious, perverse and like nothing you’ve ever seen. As of 2006, you will be watching the most expensive German movie ever made. And let’s face it, there aren’t many movies featuring serial killers placed in the 18th century. And well, there should be more like this.